- The internet and Hieronymus Bosch : Fear, Protection, and Liberty in Cyberspace
- City (City Marketing)
- How Hieronymus Bosch connected with the Internet?
- What's my interest about this topic? : SNS, Rumor about Sewol Ferry, censorship&law
- What's 'fear' in cyberspace?
- Copyright in cyberspace
[Politician should/should not use SNS to communicate to the public]
[Capital cities around the world communicate to other city on network]
[Cloud System should be banned]
SNS, the fasted and multi-direction communication systems are already pervaded. During I researched Copenhagen, Denmark for contest, I found that Copenhagen have had Twitter account and Facebook pages to promote and communicate, however, they didn't seem be working well. Though I needed to gather more information, abandoned pages allowed no information to use. Also, Incheon, Korea have made sns and blog account and even they are already closed two years ago and abandoned too. They all seemed not only they had no idea to interact but the cities doesn't be managed even they are not. I thought it could means activated networking pages are good ways to contribute to put ideas that a city is working to develop and communicate with the public into people's head.
Using sns marketing is prevailing in online and offline market cause a lot of people have account and access sns having purpose of usage. How about using sns to promote cities all around world? What if people all over the world can look around what's happening in various cities? Isn't it good chance not only to cities but also people who use sns pages and is interested in trip or festival and so on? I have heard that many official cites change their field from 'official websites' to 'sns pages' because of immediacy and unweighted atmosphere sns pages have in newspaper article. (I'm afraid i can't find the article anymore.) I come up with a suggestion cities should have one or more sns account to interact others and make their images as opened and unburdened so that make everybody feel free to announce opinions.
[Politician should/should not use SNS to communicate to the public]
[Capital cities around the world communicate to other city on network]
[Cloud System should be banned]
[Cities should communicate to the public on network(vitalization city own websites/ City SNS)]
SNS, the fasted and multi-direction communication systems are already pervaded. During I researched Copenhagen, Denmark for contest, I found that Copenhagen have had Twitter account and Facebook pages to promote and communicate, however, they didn't seem be working well. Though I needed to gather more information, abandoned pages allowed no information to use. Also, Incheon, Korea have made sns and blog account and even they are already closed two years ago and abandoned too. They all seemed not only they had no idea to interact but the cities doesn't be managed even they are not. I thought it could means activated networking pages are good ways to contribute to put ideas that a city is working to develop and communicate with the public into people's head.
Using sns marketing is prevailing in online and offline market cause a lot of people have account and access sns having purpose of usage. How about using sns to promote cities all around world? What if people all over the world can look around what's happening in various cities? Isn't it good chance not only to cities but also people who use sns pages and is interested in trip or festival and so on? I have heard that many official cites change their field from 'official websites' to 'sns pages' because of immediacy and unweighted atmosphere sns pages have in newspaper article. (I'm afraid i can't find the article anymore.) I come up with a suggestion cities should have one or more sns account to interact others and make their images as opened and unburdened so that make everybody feel free to announce opinions.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기